-
Social Media Strategy: Circling the Drain: A Textual Analysis of the Watergate Scandal
For my project, Circling the Drain: A Textual Analysis of the Watergate Scandal, I want to use the social media platforms of Blogging, Twitter, and Pinterest. I believe that these three platforms will provide the best coverage and accessibility to my project. Target audience: Blogging will be aimed at scholarly individuals, mostly historians, and computer scientists to offer them a more in-depth look at my project and provide feedback Twitter will be aimed at mostly individuals not familiar with Watergate and wish to know more. There might be some scholarly individuals that might be interested in this project on this platform Pinterest will be aimed at mostly organizations and individuals…
-
What Can You Do With Crowdsourced Digitization
Crowdsourcing your artifacts to the public can be a useful way of tackling some of the work that needs to get done for a particular project. With that idea comes a fair amount of planning, preparation, and work to get ready for the outside world’s contributions. This module taught me the importance of not only having a project and artifacts but also choosing the right material for crowdsourcing and making sure that whatever you decide to do, that it is easy on the user to help. If you don’t then it can negatively impact your project and probably future funding. On the other hand, if you do succeed in that…
-
Crowdsourced Knowledge: How to Read a Wikipedia Article
Growing up in the early 2000s, I was taught that Wikipedia was not a credible source to be used independently in my papers. I had to use scholarly articles, papers, books, etc. Now in 2018, Wikipedia probably still has that stigma but I think that it is becoming more accepted if at least a reference while conducting scholarly research. When a person living in the past 17 years, wants to find out more information about a topic, say Digital Humanities they Google it. One of the top five results will be a Wikipedia article. A person in 2018 might ask how did Google but most importantly in this case, Wikipedia…
-
Comparing Three Types of Digital Tools
Voyant can be useful to understand how many particular words or phrases were uttered. Kepler_gl can help with trying to understand not only how many interviews were conducted but where. Palladio can offer the relationship between the persons involved and where. All three types of digital tools discovered can offer a new way of interpreting the Slave Narratives. I learned with the Voyant tool that certain words were used more often than others. Then I could take those list of words and input it into the Kepler_gl tool to find out where on a map. Then I can use Palladio to understand the relationship between those words, the interviewer/interviewee, and…
-
Palladio
With Palladio, the user was able to see a clearer picture of the relationships between two types of topics at a time. A limitation of Palladio and any network visualization is that there are ways of only comparing two topics and not more than two otherwise it gets harder to analyze. Based on the readings this is expected because to have more than two would be incomprehensible, especially with a large data set for the activity. For the activity we uploaded an Excel spreadsheet that was already parsed correctly. Then we had a chance to upload tables based on the input data and then filter what we wanted based on…